Constructive Disagreement: Is it Possible?
by Brian KnowlesFor many of us, the working definition of truth is, "what I believe." The working definition of error is, "what others believe." When others try to assert their opinions as truth we balk at it, opposing them vigorously with arguments that support our own position. They do the same. In the end, nobody has given any ground, nothing has been settled except perhaps a little dust, and we leave believing what we believed before the dialogue took place.
Such conversations take place all the time, and as a result of them the cause of truth is seldom advanced. Sometimes they take place literarily in the pages of The Journal (a monthly tabloid serving the Churches of God). The results are almost always the same.
Why Write for The
One man, a leader of one of the spin-off churches of God, is alleged to have said, "Thereís not a word of truth in The Journal." Where then would he find words of truth? In his own publication of course!
Iíll admit to you that this kind of writing is often a thankless task, especially in such a venue as The Journal. If you publicly disagree with the generally accepted status quo, your status changes from "one of us" to "one of them." Instantly. If you disagree radically, you move from "one of them" to "a tool of the devil." You now become a target of the hate mongers and self-appointed "defenders of the truth." "I wouldnít read his stuff if I were you, itís subversive" becomes the word on the street. The "us vs. them" mentality becomes the basis for an endless pitched battle between the forces of good (those who support the status quo) and the forces of evil (those who do not). In the course of this discourse, nothing is solved, enmities are deepened and people become more entrenched in their positions. So why bother?
My usual answer is, "Because I care." My friends typically respond, "Well why should you care? Youíre never going to change anyoneís opinion, and they donít care about you or what you think." Theyíre probably right.
Iíll admit that Iím weakening. Iím losing heart for the thankless task of trying to persuade anyone that I actually know what Iím talking about. After all, I donít have a church organization behind me. I have no hierarchical position in any ecclesiastical pecking order. I have no following, nor do I seek any. I have not received a paycheck from a church for some 21 years. Iím just "out there" tilting at windmills like some forlorn theological Don Quixote. I donít participate in "executive sessions" or high-level, vitally important, utterly critical, bleeding edge meetings of any kind. But, perhaps stupidly, I still care.
The people I write to in The Journal are my brethren, though many of them would undoubtedly reject that idea. Yet we were, for the most part, formed in the same womb: the old Worldwide Church of God. We have long wrestled with many of the same issues. We have arrived at different places.
When I read the names of certain people with whom I used to work in the ministry, and I realize that our relationship has changed, I experience pain in my heart. I know they no longer view me as they once did. Now Iím a "maverick," "out there" doing my own enigmatic thing. Iím no longer part of their "team." In their view, I may have lost my marbles, been subverted by the devil, or am just plain wrong in my views. Some wonder what will become of me, but most, as my friends remind me, probably couldnít care less.
Ministerial Walking Wounded
I have no advice for such people. Each will have to find his individual way through the wreckage. Each will have to determine between himself and God just who and what he now is. Each will have to learn that rejection by church organizations and their hierarchies is not the equivalent of rejection by God. One of my favorite scriptures -- one which helped bring me back to God after I had left him -- is Philippians 1:6: "Öbeing confident of this, that he who began a good work in you will carry it on to completion until the day of Christ Jesus." I believe that with all my heart. God has not rejected me, and since he hasnít, no other rejection matters. God will help me find my way through the wreckage of church politics, theologies and doctrines. He will light my path and point me in the right direction, and what people think of that, or of me, therefore means nothing.
Anger & Vitriol Not Fruits of the
Itís the direction of our lives that counts, not "where weíre at" at the moment. Are we moving Godward? If we are, thatís what matters. Is our character being refined in the fires of life? Then weíre moving in the right direction. Are we seeking to remain on that "strait and narrow" path that leads to life? If so, weíre on the right track. Do we really care about what Scripture says and means? Are we sensitive to the leading of the Holy Spirit? These are the things that matter to me these days. I have many treasured friends with whom it is possible for me to constructively disagree, or to be disagreed with. I cherish my ongoing dialogue with them. It brings us all closer to truth. It helps us refine our thoughts, polish our beliefs, and purge the dross. Constructive disagreement is possible, even desirable Ė if it happens in the context of love and friendship. My friends are for me, even when they disagree with me, and vice versa. No matter where they go or what they currently believe, I am for them. I seek to constructively help them through the passages of life, to be there for them when they need me.
Jesus taught, "By this shall all men know that you are my disciples, if you have love one for another." Love is not the same as agreement. Jesus didnít always agree with his disciples, and they didnít always agree with him. Yet, with the exception of the traitor Judas, they were all for him, and he for them. Peter didnít always agree with John, or Paul, or James, yet they were brethren, and they shared a ministry. The apostleís theology was large enough to allow for occasional disagreements. They were, as the three musketeers used to say, "All for one and one for all."
Disagreement In Unity
Disagreement Ė even on minor points of doctrine Ė doesnít have to divide the Church. We are all bought with the same price. There is only one Body, and it simply cannot be identified organizationally or doctrinally. It is identified by the Spirit of God and by the fruit it produces (I Corinthians 12:13, Galatians 5:22 ff.). Doctrinally the Church is all over the map. There is no common ground on the issue of whom God has chosen as our leaders these days. There is a lot of party spirit in the Church, and thatís not a good thing (I Corinthians 3).
True Christians can live with occasional disagreements with their brethren. The important thing is to recognize that they are brethren, and that they are called to support, not "dis," each other. Itís okay to occasionally disagree with each other, as did the apostles, but hatred, disagreeableness and nastiness are not a fruits of the Spirit. Discord, dissension, and factionalism are all listed as works of the flesh in Galatians 5:20). The churches of God are in the mess they are in because we have not exercised our free moral agency in ways that glorify God.
I am a true Christian, not because of what I believe or disbelieve, but because the Spirit of God has joined with my spirit that I might call God "Father" (cf. Romans 8:15-16). I am a child of God because the Father has adopted me as such, not because of my denominational affiliation or the lack thereof. I am on the path to spiritual wholeness because the Lord, not any man, is the "captain of my salvation." My faith, trust and confidence are in Jesus Christ, not in the political vicissitudes of any human leader. Human leaders rise and fall, come and go, but the Lord changes not. Yesterdayís human hero is todayís villain, but God remains righteous forever.
When it comes to settling theological arguments, "Ah cainít get no satisfaction" out of most preachers. I have to find my answers elsewhere Ė in the Lord who is the very personification of truth, and in his written Word. I do seek wise counsel of course, but for me it isnít usually found among those who believe Armstrongian doctrine. I do have a group of people whom I consider to be elder to me when it comes to understanding Scripture. When I need to, I refer to them, either directly or to their writings. I accept correction either from Scripture itself, or from their understanding of it.
Constructive disagreement has a rightful place within the body. In fact, itís healthy. As Scripture says, "Iron sharpens iron, so a man sharpens his friend." But the goal must always be objective resolution, not merely the imposition of one personís will over another. After all, we are all accountable to the Lord. He will judge our words, thoughts, arguments and deeds in due course. When we take positions, we must do so in fear of him, not any man.
Goal of Disagreement Is Unity
Each of us, as Christians, is entitled to bring forth our strong reasons for holding a given point of view. We are all entitled to challenge each otherís views. If itís done in the right spirit, unity can result. Those who are smitten with a root of bitterness cannot hope to advance the causes of truth and unity within the Body. They can only make things worse. First they must take care of the bitterness, and then reenter the ongoing dialogue among brethren.
Constructive disagreement is healthy and possible, but not common. Letís have more of it.
©Association for Christian Development