You can make the text larger or smaller by holding down on your "ctrl" key and spinning the scroll button on your mouse.Close this Window
FOOD FOR MAN
Out of love and concern for His creation, God has given laws for mankind's protection. This is one of the more misunderstood points of God's relationship with man. Most people think God only demands obedience as some kind of moral test of man's devotion to Him. While this may be partly true, it is not all of the truth concerning submission to greater wisdom. God, who made man, knows what is best for him and has provided His law for the good of man, even though He may allow us to ignore it for the present. Consider the statement made by Moses, the man God used to write much of His law,
“And the Lord commanded us to do all these statutes, to fear the Lord our God, for our good always, that he might preserve us alive...” (Deuteronomy 6:24).
If people would just believe
that and look for the reasons to keep His law instead of all the
excuses they can find to justify breaking it, they would be much
healthier and happier. Pride and self will cause man to view God's
commands as harsh unreasonable demands of an illogical and
inconsistent God. Therefore, men go forward in ignorance like the
child who insists on playing in the busy street, totally unaware of
Much has already been written about the dangers to health from eating pork, shellfish, fats, etc., so we will refrain from the temptation of listing the known harmful effects again in this writing. We will only point out that new discoveries are being made periodically about the importance of man's diet in relation to his health. Many dangers, not discovered until this century, have been avoided by those who obeyed the Bible. Hence, we choose to approach this subject from the aspect of obedience to God and take for granted that we will benefit both physically as well as spiritually since His commands are “for our good always.”
DIETARY LAWS WERE GIVEN
The Bible says very little about
the meat in man's diet previous to the flood of Noah's day, about
1,656 years after creation, according to the Genesis account.
However, we can be sure of one thing, God had by that time at least
made a distinction between the clean and unclean animals. Nearly 900
years before Moses codified the laws for the nation of Israel, God
instructed Noah to take both the clean and unclean animals into the
every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his
female: and of beasts that are not clean by two, the male and his
female” (Genesis 7:2).
The history of the antediluvian
world is not detailed enough to be positive of just when this
distinction was known to man, but it is just as rational to believe
that Adam knew some animals were unclean from the very beginning as
to believe God made it known in some later generation. This seems
especially true when we consider the reason for God's laws are always
for man's good.
The fact that God had given man
an established set of laws prior to the time of Moses is again made
positive when the Bible speaks of Abraham, who lived about 400 years
before Moses. We may not be able to prove to ourselves what all was
in those laws, but we can know for sure they existed.
“Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statures, and my laws” (Genesis 26:5).
God has said, “For I am the Lord, I change not...”
(Malachi 3:6), it is reasonable to
assume these laws and commandments were much the same as those given
through Moses at the later time, though it cannot be proven beyond
THE CLEAN AND UNCLEAN FOODS
Everyone who believes the Bible to be the inspired Word of God can be certain of which flesh foods God instructed Moses to select for man's diet.
“Speak unto the children of Israel, saying, These are the beasts which ye shall eat among all the beasts that are on the earth. Whatsoever parteth the hoof, and is clovenfooted, and cheweth the cud, among the beasts, that shall ye eat” (Leviticus 11:2-3).
Likewise, He was specific about what not to eat and listed them in Leviticus 11;4-8, including the camel, coney, hare, and swine.
Further, God limits fish foods to those which have fins and scales, thus eliminating from man's diet many water creatures such as catfish, octopus, shellfish, etc.
“Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you” (Leviticus 11:12).
Then He lists the birds and
insects which we are to avoid eating in verses 13-23, while naming
those which are clean and edible. Leviticus chapter 11 should be read
carefully by all who want to walk totally in the ways of God.
BLOOD AND FAT FORBIDDEN
Among some ethnic groups, it is popular to eat not only the animals which the Bible forbids, but also blood of animals. Indeed blood sausage is considered a delicacy in some cultures. The pagan custom of drinking blood from freshly killed, and sometimes still living, cattle is still practiced in parts of the world. The Bible strictly practiced in parts of the world. The Bible strictly forbids this practice.
“And whatsoever man there be of the house of Israel, or of the strangers that sojourn among you, that eateth any manner of blood; I will even set my face against that soul that eateth blood, and will cut him off from among his people” (Leviticus 17:10.
Such activities are listed along with idolatry and fornication in Luke's history.
“That ye abstain from meats offered to idols, and from blood,and from things strangled, and from fornication: from which if ye keep yourselves, ye shall do well. Fare ye well (Acts 15:29).
Research has shown that the blood of animals can carry diseases to the eater thereof.
In just the past few years, man is beginning to learn the detrimental consequences of eating too much fat in his diet. According to some nutritionists, we should limit our intake of fat calories to about 15% of our total caloric diet. The wisdom of our God shows in His inspired words of about 3,500 years ago,
“It shall be a perpetual statute for your generations throughout all your dwellings, that ye eat neither fat nor blood” (Leviticus 3:17).
Also read Leviticus 7:23 and 26.
Evidently, God is saying that we get enough fats from those
vegetables which contain them and whatever is in the lean part of our
meat. After all these years, some men are just beginning to recognize
the benefit of this law from their Creator.
DID NOT CHANGE THESE LAWS
we will address some of the New Testament texts which have been used
to support the erroneous idea that God's laws regarding foods have
been changed. But, first we want to be sure that what we eat today
could be an abomination to God. To prove this point, we ask that you
look up Isaiah chapter 66 in your own Bible to be sure we are not
taking His words out of context. In fact, it is very important that
we put these prophetic events in historical context.
in verse 14, Isaiah is prophesying about the second coming of Christ.
He proceeds to tell how God will judge all
flesh. This has never
occurred in history of man since the flood, therefore, it must be yet
in the future. Next, Isaiah tells some specific things being done by
men that God calls an abomination and condemns the ones who practice
will quote from the King James Version using emphasis to bring out
clearly our point.
“They that sanctify
themselves, and purify themselves in the gardens behind one tree in
the midst, eating swine's flesh and the abomination, and the
mouse, shall be consumed together, saith the Lord. For I know their works and their thoughts:
it shall come, that I will gather all nations and tongues; and they shall come, and see
my glory” (Isaiah 66: 17, 18).
Never before has God gathered all the nations to see His glory. This occurs when Christ returns to the earth to judge the nations. This proves that God still, in our day, condemns the use of swine's flesh and the mouse for eating purposes.
these things be true, and they certainly are, how do we explain
certain New Testament verses that seem to contradict these clear
statements? Two ways. First, we want to be sure of exactly what each
verse is saying, and what it is not saying. Second, we want to be
sure to read the full
context of the verses in
“For every creature of
God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with
thanksgiving.” (1 Timothy 4:4)
This verse is often cited to
prove that all creatures are good for food.
Taken all alone, this verse
seems to say every creature is food for food, but what happens if we
back up a couple of verses and get the fuller context of Paul's
“Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron; Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth” (I Timothy 4:2,3).
A careful reading tells us there
are other meats which are not so qualified. Leviticus chapter 11 has
listed many of these.
If truly “nothing is to be
refused,” as one isolated verse says, then we could be eating
poisons of every sort, both animal and vegetable, poison ivy, poison
oak, rattlesnake venom, scorpions and the like. Certainly, these have
a purpose in God's creation, but they are not to be received for
that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh
out of the mouth, this defileth a man.” (Matthew 15:11)
This is another verse quoted to
claim man can now eat everything with God's approval.
Again, the verse has been taken
out of its context.
The subject at hand in this chapter has nothing to do with meats. The question raised by the Pharisees is regarding their tradition of hand washing which had been added to Biblical law.
Why do thy disciples
transgress the tradition of the elders? for they wash not their hands
when they eat bread” (Matthew 15:2).
After a mild rebuke of
Pharisaical traditions being added to God's law, Jesus tells them it
is not eating with unwashed hands that defile a man. That was the
subject under discussion – unwashed hands!
What was defiling to them was
violating God's law with evil thoughts, murders, adultery, etc.
“But those things which proceed out of the mouth come forth from the heart; and they defile the man. For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies: These are the things which defile a man: but to eat with unwashen hands defileth not a man (Matthew 15:18-20).
It is certainly a questionable
conclusion to imagine Jesus saying that it is defilement to a man to
break God's law, then use His words to say He is teaching them to
break another of God's laws, the dietary laws. The real truth of the
matter is that this chapter is not dealing with the subject of clean
and unclean meats. It is a terrible distortion of scripture to say
The parallel account of this
even in Mark's gospel, as translated by some theologians, has added a
conclusion not consistent with the Greek manuscripts. These words
are a private interpretation (misinterpretation) and read as follows
in the Good News Bible, “In saying this, Jesus declared that
all foods are fit to be eaten” (Mark 7: 19). Thus, the
ill-informed reader is misled into believing the disciple, Mark,
wrote this conclusion. Watch carefully what you read in some of the
more modern translations. The added portions are usually in brackets
The King James Version makes the
meaning more clear by keep its translation in context with the whole
story, which is referring to the bodily eliminations. Alfred
Marshall's Greek English Interlinear New Testament agrees with
“I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that there is nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him it is unclean.” (Romans 14:14)
Does this verse give man the right to over-ride God's law and make his own decisions of what is right and wrong conduct? May he eat anything he likes, as long as he is so persuaded? Certainly not! At least, not with God's approval.
“Him that weak in
the faith receive ye, but not to doubtful disputations. For one
believeth that he may eat all things: another, who is weak, eateth
herbs. Let not him that eateth despise him that eateth not; and
let not him which eateth not judge him that eateth: for God hath
received him” (Romans 14:1-3)
Thus far, Paul is dealing with vegetarianism. Paul's warning is not to be judging others because they are eating only herbs.
But why could Christians refuse to eat meant since the Bible nowhere forbids it? It is necessary to realize the historical conditions under which these first century believers lived. The local meat market often sold meat from animals which had been sacrificed to pagan idols. The real question was whether or not to risk eating such meat. Paul's conclusion over this problem was not to question about the meat's origin. Hence, his advice to those in Corinth,
“Eat anything that is sold in the meat market, without asking questions for conscience' sake” (I Corinthians 10:25 NASB)
Paul knew that those who were
spiritually mature understood that the pagan ceremony of offering
meat to an idol did not defile the meat. It was the act of false
worship that would defile the believer, not the meat from such a
source. However, even though he knew this, Paul would not insist upon
his valid right to eat such questionable meat before weaker brothers.
Paul said, in effect, we are not to insist on our legitimate rights
if it would stumble a weaker brother by violation of his conscience.
“It is good neither to eat flesh, nor to drink wine, nor any thing whereby thy brother stumbleth, or is offended, or is made weak” (Romans 14:21)
Therefore, Paul is saying in Romans 14:13-14 that each person is to be guided by his own conscience when it comes to eating such meats, rather than to cause strife and stumbling by judging one another. One man might choose to be a vegetarian because of “idol offered meat from the market”, the other would choose to eat it, knowing the meat itself was not defiled. Neither position is to be viewed as a sin.
Finally, in Acts 10, Luke
narrates a vision given to Peter wherein a sheet comes down from
heaven containing unclean creatures. He hears a voice,
“Rise, Peter; kill, and eat” (Acts 10:13)
“Not so, Lord; for I
have never eaten any thing that is common or unclean” (Acts 10:14)
This event occurred several
years after Jesus had ascended to heaven. Peter had received the Holy
Spirit at Pentecost, Jesus promised that His disciples would be
guided into all truth by the Holy Spirit (John 16:13). How is it that
Peter did not know that God approved of his eating unclean animals?
Peter was perplexed. He knew
God's laws were to be obeyed, and yet this command to eat being given
in the vision disturbs Peter.
“Now while Peter
doubted in himself what this vision which he had seen should mean...”
Peter knew the vision was not
given to change God's laws of obedience, for His Word says, “I
change not.” While Peter pondered this seeming contradiction,
he was told to go with three men who were seeking him, “doubting
Immediately following this is
the story of the conversion of the Gentile Cornelius. To understand
the gem of truth from this experience, read the whole account from
Acts 10:9-34. Especially notice Peter's appraisal of the meaning of
the vision as he gave it in the 28th verse,
“And he said unto them,
Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to
keep company, or come unto one of another nation; but God hath
shewed me that I should not call any man common or unclean."
The meaning of the vision had
been made clear to Peter. God was not changing His laws concerning
clean and unclean foods. God
was beginning to call Gentiles; Peter should no longer let the
custom of the Jews prevent him from preaching salvation to the
“Then Peter opened his
mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of
persons” (Acts 10:34)
Peter was made to understand the
vision. The unclean animals were a symbol God had used to teach
Peter that He had created all men and Peter was no longer to assume
that His love extended only to the Jews. In no way does this vision
teach God had changed His dietary laws for man.
is true that only clean animals were to be used in any sacrifices to
God. For example, when Noah left the ark he chose only from among the
clean animals to make sacrifices.
“And Noah builded an
altar unto the Lord; and took of every clean beast, and of every
clean fowl, and offered burnt offerings on the altar” (Genesis 8:20)
Likewise, when the tabernacle
was later built, and finally the temple, only clean animals were
There is a lesson to be learned
from this if we care to apply it. Only clean animals could be used in
God's temple as He commanded. What is God's temple today? We are! The
members of His church, both individually and collectively.
“If any man defile the
temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy,
which temple ye are” (I Corinthians 3:17)
The point is obvious. If we
recognize the spiritual and physical harm caused by disobeying God,
satisfying our own lust, and insisting upon eating what God calls
unclean for food, we will surely pay the price of ill health
spiritually and physically in due time.
Mankind today wants to ignore God as lawmaker. Even many of those who claim Him as their Savior disclaim Him as their Lord by their disobedience. Jesus said,
“It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God” (Matthew 4:4)
As believers, we are not free to pick and choose from His Word what we live by. If we have accepted Him as our Lord, let us live as He instructs us – by every word.
Churchlight Publishing Association